|
Using Grounded Theory to Examine People’s Attitudes Toward How Animals are
Used
Sarah Knight, Karl Nunkoosing, Aldert Vrij, and Julie Cherryman
This study uses qualitative methodology to examine why people have different
attitudes toward different types of nonhuman animal use. Seventeen participants
took part in a semi-structured interview. The study used Grounded Theory to
analyze the interviews and developed a model that consists of 4 major themes:
(a) “attitudes toward animals,” (b) “knowledge of animal use procedures,” (c)
“perceptions of choice,” and (d) “cost-benefit analysis.” The findings
illustrate that cognitive processing, characteristics of the species of animal
being used, and the type of animal use can all influence attitudes toward animal
use. Because previous research has focused on participant variables such as age
and gender to explain variance in attitudes toward animal use (Furnham & Pinder,
1990; Kellert & Berry, 1981) and measured attitudes toward animal use in general
(rather than distinguishing between different types of use) (Armstrong &
Hutchins, 1996), these findings can add to knowledge of people’s views on animal
use. This paper discusses how such views may be justified and maintained.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Controlling the Wilderness: The Work of Wilderness Officers
Helene M. Lawson
Ideologies having roots in the legal structure of the system of wildlife
protection characterize the work culture of the Pennsylvania wilderness officer.
This paper examines these ideologies and the characteristically strong social
solidarity of the community of wilderness officers. Wilderness officers are both
law enforcement agents and conservationists. They mediate between human and
animal as well as between what is considered scientific management and what is
considered unenlightened and even lawless behavior. In performing this boundary
work, wilderness officers participate in the social construction of the science
of land management, which views animals as renewable resources. The wilderness
officer’s job is to insure the continuation of this resource as a part of the
natural heritage of Pennsylvania and the United States. The wilderness officer’s
concept of “animal” becomes a byproduct of this social construction and of the
culture of hunting that supports it. The rural upbringing common to many
officers suits them ideally to their task.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An Exploration of the Sculptures of Greyfriars Bobby, Edinburgh, Scotland, and
the Brown Dog, Battersea, South London, England
Hilda Kean
This article analyzes the sculptural depiction of two nonhuman animals,
Greyfriars Bobby in Edinburgh, Scotland and the Brown Dog in Battersea, South
London, England. It explores the ways in which both these cultural depictions
transgress the norm of nineteenth century dog sculpture. It also raises
questions about the nature of these constructions and the way in which the
memorials became incorporated within particular human political spaces. The
article concludes by analyzing the modern “replacement” of the destroyed early
twentieth century statue of the Brown Dog and suggests that the original meaning
of the statue has been significantly altered.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Charming as a Pig: The Discursive Construction of the Relationship Between
Pigs and Humans
Arran Stibbe
In the past, pigs, kept near their guardians’ (owners) homes, ate leftovers from
their owners' kitchens and enjoyed a generally close relationship with humans.
The closeness of the relationship, combined with its ultimate end in the killing
of the pig, led to a sense of shame Leach (1964). This shame manifested itself
in negative expressions about pigs within the English language, which remain to
this day. However, the relationship between humans and pigs is becoming
increasingly distant, with decisions affecting pigs' lives made in the offices
of agricultural industry executives far from the intensive farms on which the
pigs live. The new relationship has led to the evolution of a new discourse
about pigs, that of the modern pork industry. Because of its technical and
scientific nature, this new discourse does not contain the explicit insults of
mainstream discourse. Yet, embedded within it are a series of implicit
ideological assumptions designed to justify the confinement and exploitation of
pigs in high intensity farms. This paper investigates the discourses surrounding
pigs in both mainstream (British) culture and the pork industry and discusses
attempts to challenge these discourses.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Bird in the House: An Anthropological Perspective on Companion Parrots
Patricia K. Anderson
Although companion birds are the third most-common animal companion -- after
dogs and cats -- in U.S. households, few anthrozoological publications focus on
them. This study examines the role of companion parrots in American households.
The study combines a literature review with the results of a survey of bird
owners and participant observation. The study uses the resulting qualitative and
quantitative data in addressing the social dynamics of companion parrot
ownership in the household. The data support the impression that companion
parrots increasingly are being considered family members, or “Fids” (“Feathered
Kids”), thus following current trends in American society that accord companion
animals in general a greater investment in time, money, and emotion. However,
the general public is not well informed about the complexities of captive parrot
care, and psittacine wellness is an important concern.
For
FULL TEXT of all issues, including the most current, click
FULL TEXT
To
order Society & Animals Journal, go to our secure online
ordering page
You
can Search the online issues of Society & Animals, as well
as the entire Society & Animals Forum (formerly PSYETA)
website,
for topics and keywords of your interest:
|